Legal Opinion
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Waterbury, Inc. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1980PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotteb, C. J.
This court decided on February 28, 1980, that the conclusions of the trial court were legally correct and could not be disturbed. The following is the full opinion of this court.
The plaintiff, a property owner and taxpayer in the city of Waterbury, brought this action seeking a writ of mandamus requiring the defendant, the sole assessor for the city of Waterbury (hereinafter the city) to fulfill his statutory duty of revaluing real property every ten years, in accordance with General Statutes § 12-62, 1 by filing a revalued 1979 grand list on or before January 31, 1980. From the judgment of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. FaheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. MilanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review of the Town of MiddleburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.