Legal Opinion

Romo v. Ford Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 2002No. F034241PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.

This case involves an appeal and a cross-appeal after the trial court granted in part and denied in part defendant Ford Motor Company’s posttrial motions. The court denied defendant’s motion for new trial on liability and compensatory damages; denied defendant’s motion to reduce punitive damages as excessive; and denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). From these orders defendant appeals. The court granted defendant’s motion for new trial on punitive damages grounded on juror misconduct; from this order plaintiffs appeal.

We…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bardis v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Crossroads Investors, L.P. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API