Legal Opinion
Gulick v. City of Pittston
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:CV-12-0141PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant City of Pittston’s (the “City”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff Greg Gulick (“Gulick”) claims that he was terminated from his employment with the *327City in violation of his First Amendment association rights. Additionally, Gulick asserts that the City violated the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., during the course of his employment.1 In moving for summary judgment on the First Amendment claims, the City contends that Gulick cannot…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BORZAK v. CITY OF BETHLEHEMDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- DIFLAVIS v. CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- KAYNAROGLU v. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Snead v. SteifDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021