Legal Opinion
BORZAK v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 23, 2021No. 5:19-cv-05716Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUZANNE BORZAK : : No. 19-cv-5716-JMY v. : : CITY OF BETHLEHEM, ALICIA KARNER : AND DARLENE HELLER. MEMORANDUM YOUNGE, J. December 23, 2021 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Motion for Summary Judgement (hereinafter “MSJ”), ECF No. 12.) For the reasons stated in this Memorandum, Defendants’ motion will be granted, and Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed. I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND: A. Procedural Background: Borzak brought this employment discrimination action after she was…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.