United States v. Askia Washington
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcKEE, Circuit Judge
I agree with the Majority’s thoughtful and persuasive discussion of the discovery and ineffective counsel issues this case presents. I therefore join Part II.A and Part II.C of the Majority Opinion. However, I disagree with my colleagues’ rejection of Washington’s sentencing manipulation claim and his assertion that the mandatory minimum sentence should not apply in these unique circumstances. Accordingly, I must respectfully dissent from Part II.B.
I. Stash-House Sting Operations
Arguably, undercover sting operations, including ones involving fictitious stash houses, can be a valuable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Mark William Paul StauferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.