Legal Opinion

Warfield v. Gardner

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 29, 2004No. CV 04-0974-PHXJATPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TEILBORG, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Defendants Marc A. Gardner and North American Bancard, Inc.’s (“NAB”): (1) “Motion to Dismiss Complaint (1) for Improper Venue, (2) for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or (3) Transfer Venue” (Doc. # 6); (2) Motion to Dismiss RICO Claim (Doc. # 7); and (3) Motion to Dismiss Conversion Claim (Doc. # 8). Plaintiff Lawrence J. Warfield has filed Responses to each of the Defendants’ Motions (Docs. ## 11, 12, 13), and the Defendants have filed Replies in support of their Motions (Docs. ## 17, 18, 19). Because the Court finds that it has…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gotbaum Ex Rel. Gotbaum v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  2. KAIA Foods, Inc. v. BellafioreDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Warfield v. AlanizDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  4. JTH Tax, Inc. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  5. Beougher v. Regenerative Medicine International LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API