JTH Tax, Inc. v. Williams
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Therefore, to the extent that any factual or legal allegations in the Plaintiffs' Opposition *654contradict or diverge from those in the Amended Complaint, the court will consider only the version of the allegations that appears in the Amended Complaint. See Marks v. Dann, 600 F. App'x 81, 89 (4th Cir. 2015) ("The district court properly deemed these matters outside the complaint and refused to consider them as part of its Rule 12(b)(6) analysis."); Morgan Distrib. Co. v. Unidynamic Corp., 868 F.2d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 1989) ("[I]t is axiomatic that a complaint may not be amended by briefs in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brittany Monet Baines v. Equifax, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and TransUnionDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026
- Clark v. Liberty University, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Keiter, Stephens, Hurst, Gary & ShreavesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Frost Solutions, LLC v. Patrick Baglien, Christopher Lareau, and Vue Robotics, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2026
- ISK Biocides, Inc. v. Pallet Machinery Group Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.