Legal Opinion
Warfield v. Alaniz
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 5, 2006No. CV03-2390-PHWATPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER SUPERCEDES AUGUST 1, 2006, ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Receiver’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 464) and the Rada Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 476). The Court now rules on the motions.
I. INTRODUCTION
Lawrence Warfield (the “Plaintiff’ or the “Receiver”) is the court-appointed Receiver for the Mid-America Foundation (“Mid-America”). On April 14, 2005, the Plaintiff filed his Third-Amended Complaint. On December 29, 2005, the Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment on the fraudulent-transfer claim alleged against…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Donell v. KowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lewis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Warfield v. AlanizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Donell v. KeppersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.