Legal Opinion

Parker Corn Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages to a carload of corn because of defendant’s alleged negligence in transporting and handling it en route when it was discovered that the corn was heating and had to be sent to an elevator for reconditioning.

The main facts were these: In November, 1923, at Cedar Bluffs, Kan., defendant received for shipment a carload of corn consigned to Kansas City, Mo. The bill of lading with draft drawn attached bore the memorandum, “Notify the Parker Corn Company, Kansas City, Missouri.” Before arrival of the corn, the Parker…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. F. H. Stannard & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Mollohan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Easdale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kanotex Refining Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Lee v. Midwest Cold Storage & Ice Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. BuckleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Minot Hooper Co. v. Crowley Industrial Bag Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API