Neil v. State

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

The petitioner has appealed from an order in a proceeding under the provisions of K. S. A. 60-1507 denying a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence rendered after a conviction of burglary in the second degree and larceny.

Appellant’s sole contention is that the prosecuting attorney’s remarks to the jury in his closing argument were prejudicial and in violation of K. S. A. 62-1420.

A similar question was raised in the original appeal from the conviction, judgment and sentence. In that case (State v. Neil, 203 Kan. 473, 454 P. 2d 136.) we…