Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1970No. 45,944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

The appellant, Albert Lonzo Cantrell, and Janet Louise Weinman were charged in separate informations of the crime of burglary and larceny in connection with burglary. Their cases were consolidated at their request and they were tried jointly. They were found guilty; separate appeals were taken to this court, and the convictions were sustained. (State v. Cantrell, 201 Kan. 182, 440 P. 2d 580; State v. Weinman, 201 Kan. 190, 440 P. 2d 575.)

At the original trial an agent of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation was permitted to testify concerning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Jose Rios-Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Lipscomb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. State v. Porter, Green & SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Yurk v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API