Legal Opinion

State v. Bengsch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1902PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Ron. W. W. Graves, Judge. (1) The. act contains hut one subject and it is clearly expressed in its title. Section 28, article 4 of the Constitution must be given a reasonable construction. Hannibal v. Marion Co.; 69 M'o. 572; State ex rel. v. Ransone, 73 Mo. 78; State ex rel. v. Shepherd, 74 Mo. 310; State ex rel. v. County Court, 102 Mo. 537; Alleghany County Homes Cases, 77 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Ron. W. W. Graves, Judge. (1) The. act contains hut one subject and it is clearly expressed in its title. Section 28, article 4 of the Constitution must be given a reasonable construction. Hannibal v. Marion Co.; 69 M'o. 572; State ex rel. v. Ransone, 73 Mo. 78; State ex rel. v. Shepherd, 74 Mo. 310; State ex rel. v. County Court, 102 Mo. 537; Alleghany County Homes Cases, 77 Pa. St. 77; State v. Matthews, 44 Mo. 523; State ex rel. v. Laflin, 75 Mo. 358; State v. Brassfield, 81 Mo. 151; Ewing v. Hoblit-zelle, 85 Mo. 64; St. Louis v. Teifel, 42 Mo>. 578;…

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Prosecution for alleged violation of some of the provisions of an act approved April 17, 1901, entitled as follows:

“An act to provide for a State license tax on distilled liquors, including whiskey, brandy, rum, gin and distilled spirits of all kinds, wines and all kinds of vinous liquors; to create the office of special license commissioner, and to provide for the appointment thereof by the governor.”

As the act in its entirety will accompany this opinion it is deemed unnecessary to set it forth here at large. But such sections of it which occasion demands, to be specifically discussed, will…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Chy Lung v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. City of St. Louis v. WeitzelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. City of Amarillo v. TutorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API