Legal Opinion

Randolph v. General Investors Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 29, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case was filed for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of lands, dated July 31st, 1916, which was made between the complainant, Ella A. Randolph, and the defendant the General Investors Company.

The defendants rely upon five grounds for the dismissal of the bill as to both defendants, and one ground for dismissal as to Frank B. Colton.

The first ground is that, because of the provision in the contract for liquidated damages, the complainant is not entitled to a decree of specific performance, but should be left to her action at law. The clause in question reads…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. NorcrossNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  2. Rittenhouse v. SwiecickiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Gerba v. MitruskeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  4. Crane v. PeerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re TatnallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Nolan v. KirchnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. Stockfleth v. BrittenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API