Legal Opinion

Kedney v. Hooker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1930No. 21478PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

On the 26th day ofTSpril, 1930, Hess & Jess Thompson et al., as plaintiffs, commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county, state of Oklahoma, by' filing- in the office of the court clerk their petition against A. L. Harris et al., an action praying for the appointment of a receiver. Plaintiffs’ petition in said action is verified, and, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

“Come now the plaintiffs and for their cause of action against the defendants, allege and state:
“(1) That a great number of the plaintiffs are resident citizens of Oklahoma county, Okla., and a great number of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. PughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Bar of Oklahoma v. McGheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Bloch v. Sun Oil CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Harden v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Warren v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API