Legal Opinion
Kroll v. Bell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1982No. 1-680A150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF CASE
Geoffrey Kroll, a minor, and his father, Gerald Kroll, appeal from a negative verdict and judgment on their claim for damages against Foster Bell. We affirm.
FACTS
Geoffrey was seriously injured as a result of a collision between the motorcycle he was driving and a pick up truck driven by Bell. Bell was travelling north along Pen-dleton Pike in Indianapolis at approximately 40-50 miles per hour and did not see Geoffrey until the motorcycle was in front of him. Bell immediately applied his brakes which held until the point of impact at which time they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spivey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lamb v. YorkIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Ver Hulst v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hainey v. ZinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of HSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Naked City, Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Transport Insurance Co. v. Terrell Trucking, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rector v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Smock v. HoeingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985