Legal Opinion
Naked City, Inc. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 26, 1984No. 3-282A23PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
Pursuant to guilty pleas, Richard Drost and Naked City, Inc. were convicted on several counts of "exhibition of an obscene performance" together with single counts of "offering to distribute obscene matters," "displaying matters harmful to minors," and "sponsoring an obscene performance depicting a person under the age of 16 years." See IC 835-80-10.1-1 et seq. All the charges except "sponsoring an obscene performance depicting a person under the age of 16 years" were misdemeanor charges. The latter charge is a Class D felony.
The evidentiary background discloses that Drost is…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Hughes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dillon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Kotsopoulos v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.