Legal Opinion
Roth v. Brownell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 1953No. Civ. No. 3943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment.
The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that his separation from his position in the Department of Justice was unlawful and void because in violation of the Lloyd-LaFollette Act, 37 Stat. 555 (1912), as amended 62 Stat. 354 (1948), 5 U.S.C.A. § 652(a)1 and not in conformity with § 9.102 of the Civil Service Regulations, 5 C.F.R. § 9.1022, and directing *364the defendants to restore him to his position'as Trial Attorney GS-14 in the Department.
Plaintiff acquired a competitive civil service status on April…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bailey v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Lamb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roth v. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Schmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961