Legal Opinion
In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Marinus
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 9, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PETRELLA, J.A.D.
Rene W. Nadeau, Jr. appeals from a determination of the Probate Part of Superior Court, Ocean County, holding that he was not entitled to take his deceased wife’s estate as an omitted spouse under N.J.S.A. 3B:5-15, but was only entitled to take an elective share under N.J.S.A. 3B:8-1, et seq., because certain documents authored by decedent subsequent to her marriage to Nadeau republished decedent’s will which had been executed prior to their becoming husband and wife.
For the reasons hereinafter stated we are satisfied that the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Allegro v. Afton Village Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Kenwood Assocs. v. Bd. of Adj. EnglewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Filippone v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Aqua Marine Prod. v. Pathe ComputerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Hammer v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Matter of Estate of SiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.