Legal Opinion

Klimko v. Rose

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1980PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

WILENTZ, C. J.

Plaintiffs, George and Theresa Klimko, brought this action against Dr. Rose, a chiropractor, for injuries to Mr. Klimko including a stroke and temporary paralysis, which allegedly resulted from chiropractic adjustments performed upon him' by defendant. Plaintiff’s only expert witness was a medical doctor. For reasons discussed below he was unavailable for cross-examination, and his direct testimony was therefore stricken. Believing that he had no case without the stricken testimony, Klimko moved for a mistrial. The trial court denied the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Sommers v. McKinneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Estate of Chin v. St. Barnabas Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API