Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Yellow Cab Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1948No. Civ. 13518PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, following the verdict of a jury, awarding plaintiff the sum of $6,000 for personal injuries.

The action arose as a result of a quarrel involving physical encounter between plaintiff and the defendant Robert Blanc, a cab driver for defendant Yellow Cab Company.

Plaintiff and his wife hired the Yellow Cab driven by defendant Robert Blanc at about 10 o’clock p.m., on May 31, 1944, at 10th and Market Streets in San Francisco, and were • driven to their residence at 33d Avenue and Taraval Street. From this point on there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knoxville Traction Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Falls v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fowler v. RandleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Blomsness v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Parker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Marshall v. United AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Orr v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Lilley v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API