Legal Opinion
Guy Caman, an Individual v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2006No. 03-56810PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGLAND, District Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to Article 17 of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, Oct. 12, 1929, art. 17, 49 Stat. 3000, T.S. No. 876 (1934), reprinted in note following 49 U.S.C. § 40105 (“Warsaw Convention” or “Convention”). The parties agree, and we concur, that this action is governed exclusively by the Warsaw Convention. The scope of our review is limited to whether appellant Guy Caman (“Caman”) can establish liability against appellee Continental Airlines (“Continental”) under the Convention. 1…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan TsengSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Olympic Airways v. HusainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gordon T. Carey, Jr. v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hosaka v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Phifer v. ICELANDAIRCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Twardowski v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Aziz v. AIR INDIA LTD.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Twardowski v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Armstrong v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.