Hosaka v. United Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs challenge the district court’s dismissal of their actions on the ground of forum non conveniens. Plaintiffs brought claims under the Warsaw Convention arising out of injuries sustained when their United Airlines flight from Tokyo to Hawaii encountered turbulence over the Pacific Ocean. Applying the federal common law doctrine of forum non conveniens, the district court dismissed plaintiffs’ actions in favor of a more convenient forum in Japan. Plaintiffs contend it was error for the district court to entertain United’s motions…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Premises Located at 840 140th Ave. NeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Pierre-Louis v. Newvac Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- In Re Air Crash Over Taiwan Straits on May 25, 2002District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Guy Caman, an Individual v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Air Crash Over the Mid-Atlantic on June 1, 2009District Court, N.D. California · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.