Legal Opinion
Knox v. Binkoski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 5, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
The record discloses- evidence upon which the jury could reasonably have found the verdict they rendered. The testimony of some of the witnesses relating to most material matters was flatly contradicted by the testimony of other witnesses. This was a case, as the trial court told the jury, in which the principal witnesses on one side or the other had testified falsely, and it was the duty of the jury to decide who had done so and which testimony they would believe, and it was for them only to estimate its weight. The conclusion they reached was not inconsistent with the law stated to them by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Forbes v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Lawton v. HerrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Barry v. McCollomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Nanos v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Hall v. SeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Portland Silk Co. v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Schnier v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.