Legal Opinion

Iowa Pipe & Tile Co. v. Parks & Gerber

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Hamilton District Court. — IIoN. R. M. Wright, Judge.. Aotion by plaintiff as a subcontractor to recover against a public corporation under the provisions of Code Sec. 3102 the value of materials furnished for a public improvement. A general equitable demurrer to the petition was sustained. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

1' uE™AciaCim of against public corporations: drainage districts. — The defendants are: Hamilton County, Iowa ;• its county auditor; its board of supervisors; a purported drainage district within the county; Parks & Gerber and W. H. Minard. It appears from the petition that Parks & Gerber entered into " a contract to construct a certain drainage improvement for a drainage district m said county. The material allegations of the petition are as follows:

“Par. 2. That on January 11th, 1911, the defendant Hamilton County, and the defendants The Board of Supervisors of said county for and in behalf…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humboldt County v. Ward Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monona County v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Wykoff v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Houghton v. BonnicksenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API