Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Bonnicksen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1931No. 40712PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

This action is somewhat out of the ordinary. The petition, amended and substituted petition and amendments thereto are voluminous and cover every apparent material ultimate fact.

It appears from the allegations of the petition that the joint boards of supervisors of Emmet and Kossuth counties established a drainage district to be known as Emmet and Kossuth county drainage district No. 2. - On July 31st, 1914, a contract in writing was entered into on behalf of the respective boards of the two counties with Clyde A. Walb for the construction of the drainage improvement established within said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Board of Supervisors v. . DeyoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Board of Supervisors v. District Court of Scott CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. First National Bank v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Iowa Pipe & Tile Co. v. Parks & GerberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon Construction Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API