Wykoff v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Humboldt District Court. — N. J. Lee, Judge. This is an appeal from a decree rendered against the defendant surety company and in favor of Drainage District No. 2 of Humboldt County. A number of case3 were consolidated and tried together.. Other claimants intervened. Tlie cases were tried in equity. The surety company appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
i. drains : construction : contract, breach of: insolvency withhowing°paymates.01' cst1’ The plaintiff, Wykoff, in the case entitled as above, first brought suit against defendant W. L. Stewart, contractor, and the surety company. Two other parties, Lehigh Sewér Pipe & Tile Company, and Lehigh Clay Products Company, brought separate actions. Five or six others filed petitions of in-, tervention. Other defendants are the board of supervisors and its chairman, the county auditor, the drainage district, and other claimants. As said, on the hearing of the main c.ase of the drainage district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haskel v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Cosson v. BradshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Epeneter v. Montgomery CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Simonson Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens State Bank of GoldfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monona County v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Center Drainage District No. 1 v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967