Legal Opinion

Dansby v. North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the service of the original process in the manner set forth in the Mississippi judgment was a valid service under the laws of the State of Mississippi. The validity and effect of a judgment of another state must be determined by reference to the laws of the state where rendered.

Art. IY, sec. 1, of the Constitution of the United States commands that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the judicial proceedings of every other state. . And the acts of the Congress enacted in the exercise of the power thus granted specifically…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. AgnewMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Globe Rutgers Fire Insurance v. SayleMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  3. National Surety Co. v. Board of Supr'sMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In Re OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Walton v. Gregory Funeral HomeMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Thomas v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Willard Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Rossi v. SpoloricCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API