Legal Opinion

Advanced Materials, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 17, 2000No. 94-621CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant’s motion asserts that plaintiffs claim should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or alternatively 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. After reviewing the briefs and hearing oral argument, the court hereby DENIES defendant’s motion with regard to plaintiffs termination for convenience claim, and GRANTS the motion on the breach of contract claim.

FACTS

On September 26, 1990, the U.S. Dept, of the Army awarded a cost plus fixed fee contract to Advanced Materials,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Libertatia Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. J. Cooper & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Kiewit Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Made in the USA Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API