Legal Opinion

In Re Davenport for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

It is certain that the justice of the peace had no authority to hold court at the place where it is alleged in the petition sentence was imposed on the respondent. Section 949, Or. L., provides :

“A justice’s court is a court held by a justice of the peace, within the precinct for which he may be chosen.”

In 16 B. O. L. 364 we find:

“Where a justice of the peace goes outside of the limits of his jurisdiction and undertakes to hold his court, lie neither has jurisdiction of the subject matter nor of the person; and no waiver or agreement made before him outside of his jurisdiction can confer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re MoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. In re MoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Ex parte FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ex parte WessensOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hill v. McCrowOregon Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Quinn v. HanksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gage v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Whitlock v. United States Inter-Insurance Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jensen v. SevyUtah Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API