Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. United States Inter-Insurance Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

The testimony taken in this cause is not before this court. The defendants assign as error that the findings of fact do not support the judgment. The findings of fact, as made by the court, were in substance as follows: Fred E. Lyons was operating, in and about the city of Klamath Falls, what is known as “anywhere for hire” bus service. About November 10,1927, he procured from the Public Service Commission a permit describing a certain Buick automobile as the car he was authorized to use in his business. At the time of the accident, which was the cause of the litigation, Lyons used a certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jaloff v. United Auto Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. School Dist. No. 106 v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Interstate Casualty Co. of Birmingham v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. In Re Davenport for a Writ of Habeas CorpusOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Pierce v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. Republic UnderwritersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Doherty v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. Morris and Gertrude Relder, and the Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Close-Smith v. ConleyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  5. Trinity Universal Ins. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API