Legal Opinion

Hark’n Technologies, Inc. v. Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 25, 2026No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., M E M O R A N D U M DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART [386] DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEY FEES ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, C a s e N o . 1 : 2 1 - c v-00054-CMR Defendant. Chief Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Before the court is Defendant Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC’s (Orange Whip) Motion for Award of Attorney Fees (Motion) (ECF 386) incurred from the defense of the first, second, fourth, fifth, and ninth claims of relief, as well as the claims…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Chieftain Royalty Co. v. Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API