Legal Opinion

Easterbrooks v. Abrahams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1939No. 27494. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The plaintiff sued upon a restitution bond for recovery of damages sustained by reason of wrongful eviction from premises occupied by her under lease. After trial to the court, a judgment was rendered in her favor against the defendants, principal and surety on the restitution bond. The defendants appeal.

The judgment awarded the respondent four hundred dollars for direct loss suffered by the eviction, two hundred fifty dollars for attorneys’ fee incurred in defending the unlawful detainer action, and one hundred fifty dollars as an attorneys’ fee in the present action on the bond.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lovell v. House of the Good ShepherdWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. James v. CannellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gabrielson v. GorinWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Choukas v. SeverynsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gipson v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API