Siklek v. Commonwealth

Prentis,

J., delivered the opinion of the court.

The accused has been convicted of grand larceny,, and is here assigning a single error, which can be best presented by the statement of facts certified by the-trial court showing the only ruling to which he excepted.

“The court certifies that it appears from the evidence-in this case that Max Siklek was tried in the Police Court of the city of Newport News on or about the 23rd day of August, 1921, on the charge of having-bought stolen rope, knowing that same had been stolen, and was on that day dismissed on said charge by said court, but was held…