Legal Opinion

Goodwyn v. Cassels

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1922No. 3 Div. 564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Cardinal rules fdr the construction of wills need not be repeated. Smaw v. Young, 109 Ala. 528, 20 South. 370; Duncan v. De Yampert, 182 Ala. 528, 62 South. 673; Ralls v. Johnson, 200 Ala. 178, 75 South. 926; Gunter v. Townsend, 202 Ala. 160, 79 South. 644; Jemison v. Brasher, 202 Ala. 578, 81 South. 80; Lyons v. Bradley, 168 Ala. 505, 53 South. 244; Crawford v. Carlisle, 206 Ala. 379, 89 South. 565.

Generally speaking, words employed in a will are of two classes, peremptory or preca-tory; of direct and positive terms, as distinguished from entreaty, request, desire, wish, or recommendation.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. City Bank & Trust Co. v. McCaaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. First Nat. Bank v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API