Legal Opinion

Sonoma County National Bank v. Skinner

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1919No. Civ. No. 2567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge, affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, upon a directed verdict, for money due on a promissory note.

On November 28, 1914, C. F. Fury, being at the time already indebted to plaintiff, borrowed from it the sum of five hundred dollars. He executed and delivered to it his promissory note for that amount. As collateral security for the payment of this note, for what he already owed, and for future advances, he transferred to the bank a claim, for the sum of four hundred dollars, held by himself against the Helling estate, and transferred to it by indorsement the note in suit,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Texas Banking & Insurance v. TurnleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. County Bank of San Luis Obispo County v. GreenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. CorcoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API