Naisbitt v. Raichl

Plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to prevent his extradition under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), ORS 133.743 et seq, for alleged parole violations in the state of Utah. The trial court denied the writ. We affirm.

The Governor’s warrant authorizing the arrest and extradition of plaintiff was based on a representation by the Governor of Utah that plaintiff was convicted of aggravated robbery and had violated the terms of his parole.1 The documents accompanying the demand for extradition from Utah include copies of plaintiff’s judgment of conviction for…