Legal Opinion

Burnes v. Burnes, Administrator

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1941No. 4-6521PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question presented on this appeal is the validity of the following contract:

‘ ‘ State of Arkansas

‘ ‘ County of Marion

“Be it known to all men by these presence, that B. F. Burnes and Hester Lay, who are about to contract a marriage under the laws of the state aforesaid, and for their mutual benefit, and well being, have entered into- this contract, which shall be held sacred and binding forever.
“1st The said B. F. 'Burnes agrees to provide for her, a home such as he now has, or that may be in his ability to provide, so long as the said Hester Lay makes him a good and faithful wife, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Oliphant v. OliphantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Achilles v. AchillesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Comstock v. ComstockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Faver v. FaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Wylie v. WylieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Babb v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API