Legal Opinion
Burnes v. Burnes, Administrator
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 8, 1941No. 4-6521PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The question presented on this appeal is the validity of the following contract:
‘ ‘ State of Arkansas
‘ ‘ County of Marion
“Be it known to all men by these presence, that B. F. Burnes and Hester Lay, who are about to contract a marriage under the laws of the state aforesaid, and for their mutual benefit, and well being, have entered into- this contract, which shall be held sacred and binding forever.
“1st The said B. F. 'Burnes agrees to provide for her, a home such as he now has, or that may be in his ability to provide, so long as the said Hester Lay makes him a good and faithful wife, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Oliphant v. OliphantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Achilles v. AchillesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Comstock v. ComstockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Faver v. FaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Wylie v. WylieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Babb v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.