Legal Opinion

Bassick Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 20, 1930No. J-179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether lubricating outfits described in finding 3, consisting of a grease gun and nineteen nipples, assembled in packages, and advertised and sold “For use on Ford passenger cars, trucks, and tractors,” are subject to the excise tax provided in section 600, of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 253, 322 [26 USCA § 881 note, and § 882]) as parts or accessories for automobiles.

Plaintiff contends that since grease guns, grease-gun connections, and nipples are adaptable for use on other than automobiles, and when sold separately are not subject to tax,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Walker Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  4. Fairmount Tool & Forging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marwil Products Co., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Marwil Products Co., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API