Legal Opinion

Marwil Products Co., a Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 12, 1969No. 195-65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner C. Murray Bernhardt with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57(a) [since September 1, 1969, Rule 134(h)]. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on August 22, 1969. Neither party has filed a notice of intention to except to the commissioner’s report and the time for so doing pursuant to the rules of the court has expired. On October 14, 1969 defendant filed a motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 141(b) requesting that the court adopt the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Anthony Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Fairmount Tool & Forging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Crown Products Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rue R. Elston Company, Inc., Appellee-Appellant v. United States of America, Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Burruss Land and Lumber Company, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. RFI Shield-RoomsUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Marwil Products Co., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Myers v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API