Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Arizona Inc v. Tom Betlach

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2013No. 12-17558, 13-15506PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

An Arizona statute bars patients eligible for the state’s Medicaid program from obtaining covered family planning services through health care providers who perform abortions in cases other than medical necessity, rape, or incest. See Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 35-196.05(B). Such abortions are already ineligible for Medicaid coverage and so must be paid for with private funds. The Arizona law extends the ineligibility to non-abortion services such as gynecological exams and cancer screenings unless the patient’s provider agrees to stop performing privately funded elective…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Kan. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Medina v. Planned Parenthood South AtlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  3. Planned Parenthood of AR, etc. v. Cindy GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast, Inc. v. GeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API