Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Ipsen Pharma, S.A.S.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund (a/k/a Tulane University) (“Tulane”) and David H. Coy (“Dr. Coy”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed this action against Ipsen Phar-ma, S.A.S. (“Ipsen Pharma”) and Ipsen, S.A. (“Ipsen”) for correction of inventor-ship of several U.S. patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256. The complaint also alleges three claims under Massachusetts state law for unfair business practices, unjust enrichment, and constructive trust. Ipsen Pharma has alternatively moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Abramowitz v. LakeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Ipsen Pharma, S.A.S.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Scott v. Apple Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2024