Botta v. Brunner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. 82 (1958)
138 A.2d 713
NANCY BOTTA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
HERMAN G. BRUNNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 25, 1957.
Decided February 3, 1958.
Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant, Nancy Botta (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).
Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for defendant-respondent-appellant, Herman G. Brunner (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).
Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Leo Frieband (Messrs. Schneider,…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Pearson v. DohertyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978