Legal Opinion

Botta v. Brunner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 3, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. 82 (1958)

138 A.2d 713

NANCY BOTTA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,

v.

HERMAN G. BRUNNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 25, 1957.

Decided February 3, 1958.

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant, Nancy Botta (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for defendant-respondent-appellant, Herman G. Brunner (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Leo Frieband (Messrs. Schneider,…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Pearson v. DohertyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API