Christopher W. Caldbeck v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTS. 1
A. The Navy Commander’s 2009 Investigation Of Plaintiffs Alleged Misconduct.
Christopher Caldbeck (“Plaintiff’) was commissioned as an Ensign in the United States Naval Reserve on December 21, 1991. Compl. ¶ IV. On November 22,1993, Plaintiff was designated as a Surface Warfare Officer. AR at 354. Thereafter, Plaintiff received: positive fitness reports during his service (AR at 274-333); several certifications and qualifications (AR at 354-396); and other awards and commendations (AR at 335-52).
On October 4, 2008, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Enriquez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Moyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Sparks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026