Legal Opinion

Christopher W. Caldbeck v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 2013No. 11-483CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTS. 1

A. The Navy Commander’s 2009 Investigation Of Plaintiffs Alleged Misconduct.

Christopher Caldbeck (“Plaintiff’) was commissioned as an Ensign in the United States Naval Reserve on December 21, 1991. Compl. ¶ IV. On November 22,1993, Plaintiff was designated as a Surface Warfare Officer. AR at 354. Thereafter, Plaintiff received: positive fitness reports during his service (AR at 274-333); several certifications and qualifications (AR at 354-396); and other awards and commendations (AR at 335-52).

On October 4, 2008, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enriquez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. Moyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. Sparks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API