Legal Opinion

Filannino v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 2006PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered April 6, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim on the ground that it was untimely, affirmed, without costs.

On July 15, 2005, the parties entered into a stipulation, which was “so ordered” by Supreme Court, that, among other things, required plaintiff to file a note of issue on or before September 30, 2005. Plaintiff chose to file his note of issue on August 4, 2005, thereby placing this matter on the trial calendar and triggering…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. Hospital for Special SurgeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Maggio v. 24 West 57 PFF, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Guallpa v. Leon D. DeMatteis Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Hinton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Freire-Crespo v. 345 Park Avenue L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API