Scannell v. City of Saint Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of defendants.
Plaintiffs are employees of the cily of St. Paul, a city of the first class. They have been on the payroll of the fire and police departments of said city since prior to January 1, 1939. They reached their 65th birthdays prior to January 1, 1964, and are employees in good standing in the St. Paul Police Relief Association or the St. Paul Fire Department Relief Association and future beneficiaries of said pension and retirement funds. They are honorably discharged veterans of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Fabio v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Stubben v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Burns v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Essling v. St. Louis County Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985