Legal Opinion
Fabio v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1964No. 39,020PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiff, Dominick Fabio, seeks a declaratory judgment enjoining the city of St. Paul and its officials from requiring him to retire from the police department at the age of 65, and declaring Minn. St. 423.075 unconstitutional as applied to the administrative practices followed by defendants. This appeal is taken by plaintiff from a summary judgment entered by the district court in favor of the defendants.
The plaintiff began his employment in the St. Paul Police Depart ment on July 25, 1925, and continued in that position until he reached the age of 65 years on January 5, 1963.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. ObermeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.