Legal Opinion

GS Holistic, LLC v. Ashes Plus Nine

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 15, 2024No. 4:22-cv-07101Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-07101-YGR (LJC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE DENIED 10 ASHES PLUS NINE, et al., Re: ECF No. 57 Defendants. 11 12 13 The Court has referred Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC’s (GS Holistic) amended Motion for 14 Default Judgment (ECF No. 57) to the undersigned magistrate judge for a report and 15 recommendation. The undersigned has identified potential deficiencies in the service of process 16 completed on Defendants Ashes Plus Nine d/b/a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Perea-ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Jennie McCormack v. Mark HiedemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Salmon v. Dade County School BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  5. Jane Doe One v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API