Legal Opinion
Robert W. Hall v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2001No. 99-70853PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
The Petition for Panel Rehearing or Clarification is DENIED.
The opinion filed August 29, 2001, is hereby AMENDED as follows:
1. On page 11797 [263 F.3d 926, 934] of the slip opinion, the phrase “Lacking ‘force of law,’ ” is deleted, and the word “interpretations” is capitalized. After “SIP....”. and before “Interpretations” the following text and footnote is inserted: “This statement makes it clear that the SIP’s reach extends only to those it directly regulates,5 and does not have ‘force of law1 constituting binding precedent for future SIP revisions.”
2. On page 11797…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Roberto Ferrer Miranda Alvarado Madeleine Janet Morales Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- North Carolina Wildlife Federation v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.