Legal Opinion
Loyola Federal Savings Bank v. Thomasson Properties
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided March 13, 1995No. 2317PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Howell, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to strike a demand for jury trial. Loyola Federal Savings Bank brought an action for indemnity against the respondents (collectively referred to herein as Thomasson). Thomasson filed an answer demanding a jury trial. Loyola filed a motion to strike the jury trial demand on the ground that its action was purely a matter of equity. The circuit court denied the motion to strike, concluding there were “ample legal issues of fact.” Loyola appeals. We reverse.
In 1989, Loyola and Thomasson were named as codefendants in a suit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Pelfrey Ex Rel. Associated Railway Contractors, Inc. v. Bank of GreerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Verenes v. AlvanosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Walterboro Community Hospital, Inc. v. MeacherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.