Legal Opinion

United States v. Moten

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 16, 1955No. 6512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROsman, Judge:

The accused in this case was tried by general court-martial and found guilty under a charge that he had wrongfully appropriated a .45 caliber pistol, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 50 USC § 715. The findings and sentence were approved by the convening authority, and later affirmed by a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General, United States Army. Our grant of the accused’s petition for review was limited to two issues, one of which has been disposed of in a manner adverse to his position by our…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. O'NealUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. DuffyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. GuestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliendoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. HugginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. OakleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API